🔗 Share this article

Picture the following: a happy the Danish striker in a Napoli shirt. Now, place it with a dejected Benjamin Sesko sporting United's jersey, appearing like he's missed an open goal. Don't worry locating a real picture of that miss; context is your adversary. Now, add statistics in a large, silly font. Remember the emojis. Share it across all platforms.

Would you mention that Højlund's goal count includes scores in the Champions League while Sesko does not compete in Europe? Of course not. Nor will you highlight that several of Højlund's goals came against weaker national sides, or that his national team is far superior to Slovenia and creates many more chances. You manage online for a large outlet, pure interaction is your livelihood, United are the prime target, and nuance is the thing to avoid.

So the cycle of content spins. The next job is to scan a 44-minute podcast featuring the legendary goalkeeper and extract the part where he describes the acquisition of Sesko "weird". Just before, where he qualifies his comments by saying, "I have nothing bad to say about Benjamin Sesko"... well, cut that. Nobody needs that. Just make sure "weird" and "Sesko" appear together in the headline. People will be furious.

The Season of Promise and Premature Judgment

Mid-autumn has traditionally one of my favourite periods to observe football. Leaves fall, the wind turns, the teams and tactics are newly formed, all is novel and yet everything is beginning to form. The stars of the season ahead are staking their claims. The summer market is closed. No one is talking about the quadruple yet. All teams are in contention. At this precise point, anything is possible.

Yet, for many of the same reasons, this period has also been one of my most disliked times to consume news on football. For while no outcomes are decided, something must always be getting settled. Jack Grealish is reborn. The German talent has been a crushing disappointment. Is Antoine Semenyo the top performer in the league right now? Please a decision immediately.

The Player as Patient Zero

And for numerous reasons, Sesko feels like the archetype in this context, a player caught between football's two countervailing, non-negotiable forces. The need to withhold definitive judgment, to let layers of technical texture and tactical sophistication to mature. And the imperative to generate permanent verdicts, a conveyor belt of opinions and jokes, context-free criticisms and meaningless contrasts, a square that can not truly be solved.

I do not propose to provide a in-depth analysis of Sesko's stint at Manchester United to date. He has started on four occasions in the Premier League in a highly unpredictable team, found the net twice, and had a mere of 116 touches. What exactly are we analysing? And do I propose to replicate Gary Neville's and Ian Wright's seminal masterwork "The Sesko Debate", in which two of England's leading pundits duel passionately on a popular show over whether Sesko needs 10 goals to be deemed successful this year (one pundit), or whether it is more like 12 or 13 (Wright).

A Harsh Reality

Despite this I loved watching him at his former club: a powerful, fast sports car of a striker, playing in a team pitched perfectly to his talents: given the license to rampage but also the freedom to miss. Partly this is why United feels like the most unforgiving place he could possibly be at the moment: a place where "brutal verdicts" are handed down in about the time it takes to load a short advertisement, the club with the widest and most pitiless gap between the time and air he requires, and the time and air he is likely to receive.

There was a case of this during the international break, when a viral chart conveniently informed us that the player had been deemed – decisively – the poorest acquisition of the recent market by a survey of 20 agents. Naturally, the media are not the only ones in this. Club channels, influencers, anonymous X accounts with a suspiciously high number of pornbot followers: all parties with a vested interest is now essentially aligned along the same principles, an environment deliberately geared for provocation.

The Psychological Toll

Endless scrolling and tapping. What are we doing to ourselves? Are we aware, on any level, what this endless sluice of irritation is doing to our brains? Separate from the inherent strangeness of being a player in the middle of it all, knowing on some surreal chain-reaction level that every single thing about them is now essentially content, commodity, public property to be packaged and traded.

And yes, in part this is because United are United, the entity that continues to feed the cycle, a big club that must constantly be producing the big feelings. However, partly this is a seasonal affliction, a swing of opinion most clearly and harshly observed at this season, about a month after the window has closed. Throughout the summer we have been desiring players, praising them, drooling over them. Now, just a few weeks in, many of those very players are already being disdained as broken goods. Should we start to be concerned about Jamie Gittens? Did Arsenal actually need their striker necessary? What was the purpose of another expensive buy?

The Bigger Picture

It seems fitting that he meets their rivals on the weekend: a team simultaneously on a long unbeaten run at home in the league and somehow in their own situation of feverish crisis, like submitting a missing person’s report on someone who popped to the store half an hour ago. Defensively suspect. Mohamed Salah finished. Alexander Isak waste of money. The coach losing his hair.

Perhaps we have failed to understand the way the narrative of football has started to replace football itself, to inflect the way we watch it, an whole competition reoriented around talking points and immediate responses, something that occurs in the background while we scroll through our devices, unable to disconnect from the constant flow of opinions and more takes. Perhaps Sesko bearing the brunt right now. But in a way, we're all sacrificing something in this process.